Development of Plant-Derived Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody Targeting PD-L1 and CTLA-4 against Mouse Colorectal Cancer.

Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, with monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints, yielding promising clinical benefits. However, with the advent of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in clinical trials, developing next-generation antibodies with potentially increased efficacy is critical. Here, we aimed to generate a recombinant bispecific monoclonal antibody for dual inhibition of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 axes. The plant system was used as an alternative platform for bispecific monoclonal antibody production. Dual variable domain immunoglobulin atezolizumab × 2C8 is a plant-derived bispecific monoclonal antibody that combines both programmed cell death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade into a single molecule. Dual variable domain immunoglobulin atezolizumab × 2C8 was transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana and the expression level was determined to be the highest after 4 days of infiltration. The size and assembly of the purified bispecific monoclonal antibody were determined, and its function was investigated in vitro and in vivo. The molecular structures of plant-produced dual variable domain immunoglobulin atezolizumab × 2C8 are as expected, and it was mostly present as a monomer. The plant-produced dual variable domain immunoglobulin atezolizumab × 2C8 showed in vitro binding to programmed cell death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 proteins. The antitumor activity of plant-produced bispecific monoclonal antibody was tested in vivo by treating humanized Balb/c mice bearing a CT26 colorectal tumor. Plant-produced dual variable domain immunoglobulin atezolizumab × 2C8 significantly inhibited tumor growth by reducing tumor volume and weight. Body weight changes indicated that the plant-produced bispecific monoclonal antibody was safe and tolerable. Overall, this proof of concept study demonstrated the viability of plants to produce functional plant-based bispecific immunotherapy.

Anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: a narrative review with focus on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE: CD19 is a cell surface protein that is found on both healthy and malignant B cells. Accordingly, it has become an important target for novel treatments for non-Hodgkin lymphomas and B-cell leukaemia. Three anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies with distinct mechanisms of action have been developed for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. METHODS: We reviewed the preclinical and clinical data on the development of the newly approved anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies blinatumomab, tafasitamab and loncastuximab tesirine, and consider their place in the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. RESULTS: Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager that binds to both CD19 on B cells and CD3 on T cells, facilitating antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. Blinatumomab significantly prolongs overall survival in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, although cytokine release syndrome and severe neurotoxicity may necessitate discontinuation. Tafasitamab, which has modified anti-CD19 Fab and Fc regions, has significantly enhanced affinity for both CD19 and effector cell receptors compared with unmodified anti-CD19. In L-MIND, tafasitamab plus lenalidomide provided an overall response rate (ORR) of 57.5% in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients non-transplant eligible. Loncastuximab tesirine is an antibody-drug conjugate that has been studied as monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib in 3L + relapsed or refractory DLBCL. The ORR was 48.3% in a phase II trial of loncastuximab tesirine. The optimal place of anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies in therapy has yet to be determined, but the prospect of improved outcomes for at least some patients with treatment-resistant B-cell malignancies appears likely, particularly in those with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis.

Loss of CD22 expression and expansion of a CD22dim subpopulation in adults with relapsed/refractory B-lymphoblastic leukaemia after treatment with Inotuzumab-Ozogamicin.

Treatment options for relapsed or refractory B-lymphoblastic leukaemia (r/r B-ALL) are limited and the prognosis of these patients remains dismal, but novel immunotherapeutic options such as the anti-CD22 antibody-drug-conjugate Inotuzumab-Ozogamicin (InO) have improved outcomes in these patients. Flow cytometry is essential to assess antigen-expression prior to treatment initiation of antigen-directed immunotherapies. Here, we present flow cytometric and clinical data of three adult patients with r/r B-ALL who failed treatment with InO associated with reduced or lost antigen-expression. In addition, we present comparative data on two different diagnostic CD22-specific antibody clones that exhibit significant differences in staining intensities.

Does Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Overvalue Potential Cures? Exploring Alternative Methods for Applying a "Shared Savings" Approach to Cost Offsets.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate alternative methods to calculate and/or attribute economic surplus in the cost-effectiveness analysis of single or short-term therapies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of articles describing alternative methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of potentially curative therapies whose assessment using traditional methods may suggest unaffordable valuations owing to the magnitude of estimated long-term quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains or cost offsets. Through internal deliberation and discussion with staff at the Health Technology Assessment bodies in England and Canada, we developed the following 3 alternative methods for further evaluation: (1) capping annual costs in the comparator arm at $150 000 per year; (2) "sharing" the economic surplus with the health sector by apportioning only 50% of cost offsets or 50% of cost offsets and QALY gains to the value of the therapy; and (3) crediting the therapy with only 12 years of the average annual cost offsets or cost offsets and QALY gains over the lifetime horizon. The impact of each alternative method was evaluated by applying it in an economic model of 3 hypothetical condition-treatment scenarios meant to reflect a diversity of chronicity and background healthcare costs. RESULTS: The alternative with greatest impact on threshold price for the fatal pediatric condition spinal muscular atrophy type 1 was the 12-year cutoff scenario. For a hypothetical one-time treatment for hemophilia A, capping cost offsets at $150 000 per year had the greatest impact. For chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, capping cost offsets or using 12-year threshold had little impact, whereas 50% sharing of surplus including QALY gains and cost offsets greatly reduced threshold pricing. CONCLUSIONS: Health Technology Assessment bodies and policy makers will wrestle with how to evaluate single or short-term potentially curative therapies and establish pricing and payment mechanisms to ensure sustainability. Scenario analyses using alternative methods for calculating and apportioning economic surplus can provide starkly different assessment results. These methods may stimulate important societal dialogue on fair pricing for these novel treatments.

The changing treatment landscape in haemophilia: from standard half-life clotting factor concentrates to gene editing.

Congenital haemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency) and B (factor IX deficiency) are X-linked bleeding disorders. Replacement therapy has been the cornerstone of the management of haemophilia, aiming to reduce the mortality and morbidity of chronic crippling arthropathy. Frequent intravenous injections are burdensome and costly for patients, consequently with poor adherence and restricted access to therapy for many patients worldwide. Bioengineered clotting factors with enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles can reduce the burden of treatment. However, replacement therapy is associated with a risk for inhibitor development that adversely affects bleeding prevention and outcomes. Novel molecules that are subcutaneously delivered provide effective prophylaxis in the presence or absence of inhibitors, either substituting for the procoagulant function of clotting factors (eg, emicizumab) or targeting the natural inhibitors of coagulation (ie, antithrombin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, or activated protein C). The ultimate goal of haemophilia treatment would be a phenotypical cure achievable with gene therapy, currently under late phase clinical investigation.

Pasotuxizumab, a BiTE® immune therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer: Phase I, dose-escalation study findings.

Aim: We report results of a first-in-human study of pasotuxizumab, a PSMA bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) immune therapy mediating T-cell killing of tumor cells in patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients & methods: We assessed once-daily subcutaneous (SC) pasotuxizumab. All SC patients developed antidrug antibodies; therefore, continuous intravenous (cIV) infusion was assessed. Results: A total of 47 patients received pasotuxizumab (SC: n = 31, 0.5-172 µg/d; cIV: n = 16, 5-80 µg/d). The SC maximum tolerated dose was 172.0 µg/d. A sponsor change stopped the cIV cohort early; maximum tolerated dose was not determined. PSA responders occurred (>50% PSA decline: SC, n = 9; cIV, n = 3), including two long-term responders. Conclusion: Data support pasotuxizumab safety in advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer and represent evidence of BiTE monotherapy efficacy in solid tumors. Clinical trial registration: NCT01723475 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Combination therapy with B7H3-redirected bispecific antibody and Sorafenib elicits enhanced synergistic antitumor efficacy.

Rationale: Current traditional treatment options are frequently ineffective to fight against ovarian cancer due to late diagnosis and high recurrence. Therefore, there is a vital need for the development of novel therapeutic agents. B7H3, an immune checkpoint protein, is highly expressed in various cancers, representing it a promising target for cancer immunotherapy. Although targeting B7H3 by bispecific T cell-engaging antibodies (BiTE) has achieved successes in hematological malignancies during recent years, attempts to use them for the treatment of solid cancers are less favorable, in part due to the heterogeneity of tumors. Sorafenib is an unselective inhibitor of multiple kinases currently being tested in clinical trials for several tumors, including ovarian cancer which showed limited activity and inevitable side effect for ovarian cancer treatment. However, it is able to enhance antitumor immune response, which indicates sorafenib may improve the efficiency of immunotherapy. Methods: We evaluated the expression of B7H3 in ovarian cancer using online database and validated its expression of tumor tissues by immunohistochemistry staining. Then, B7H3 expression and the effects of sorafenib on ovarian cancer cell lines were determined by flow cytometry. In addition, 2D and 3D ovarian cancer models were established to test the combined therapeutic effect in vitro. Finally, the efficiency of B7H3×CD3 BiTE alone and its combination with sorafenib were evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. Results: Our data showed that B7H3 was highly expressed in ovarian cancer compared with normal samples. Treatment with sorafenib inhibited ovarian cancer cell proliferation and induced a noticeable upregulation of B7H3 expression level. Further study suggested that B7H3×CD3 BiTE was effective in mediating T cell killing to cancer cells. Combined treatment of sorafenib and B7H3×CD3 BiTE had synergistic anti-tumor effects in ovarian cancer models. Conclusions: Overall, our study indicates that combination therapy with sorafenib and B7H3×CD3 BiTE may be a new therapeutic option for the further study of preclinical treatment of OC.

Development and clinical application of bispecific antibody in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of colorectal cancer as one of the most commonly diagnosed and a frequent cause of cancer-related deaths is of great challenges in health-related issues. AREAS COVERED: Immunotherapy is the fourth pillar of cancer treatment which provides more novel therapeutic options with expanding investigational potentials. One of the modalities in immunotherapy is the use of bispecific antibodies. Despite demonstrating many promising roles, it still needs more advanced studies to identify the actual pros and cons. In this review, the application of bispecific antibody in the treatment of colorectal cancer has been explained, based on preclinical and clinical studies. The literature search was conducted mainly through PubMed in June and September 2019. EXPERT OPINION: Bispecific antibody is in its early stages in colorectal cancer treatment, requiring modern technologies in manufacturing, better biomarkers and more specific target antigens, more studies on individual genetic variations, and conducting later phase clinical trials and systematic reviews to achieve better survival benefits.

Emicizumab Improves Ex Vivo Clotting Function in Patients with Mild/Moderate Hemophilia A.

BACKGROUND: Emicizumab prophylaxis is a promising treatment that reduces bleeding events in severely affected patients with hemophilia A (PwHA). It is anticipated that emicizumab could be similarly effective in mild/moderate PwHA (PwMHA) although this effect has not been investigated. AIM: We evaluated ex vivo coagulant effects of emicizumabin PwMHA. METHODS: Clot waveform analysis (CWA) triggered by prothrombin time/activated partial prothrombin time-mixed reagents was utilized to examine coagulant effects of emicizumabin factor (F)VIII-deficient plasma mixed with recombinant (r)FVIIIand in native plasmas from 16 PwMHA. The CWA parameter, adjusted-|min1| (Ad|min1|), was used. Increases in Ad|min1| (ΔAd|min1|) mediated by emicizumab were calculated from the slopes of regression lines in the presence of rFVIII. RESULTS: Ad|min1| in FVIII-deficient plasma with various concentrations of rFVIII negatively correlated with ΔAd|min1|by adding emicizumab, and these data were defined as standard reference values. Ad|min1| (4.57 ± 0.50) in 16 PwMHA increased to 5.05 ± 0.54 and 5.37 ± 0.60 by adding emicizumab at 50 and 100 µg/mL, respectively, but remained lower than the normal range (7.22 ± 0.21). ΔAd|min1| levels were 1.5 to 2-fold higher in five cases and 0.4 to 0.6-fold lower in four cases, compared with reference values determined by rFVIII. In some cases, genetic analyses suggested that specific point mutations could have contributed to these findings. Further studies using rFVIII mutants indicated, however, that the differences in ΔAd|min1| were not related to individual FVIII gene defects. CONCLUSION: Emicizumab enhances coagulation potential in PwMHA. Assessment of ex vivo coagulant activity of emicizumab could be helpful for predicting coagulant potentials prior to treatment in these patients.

Escape or Fight: Inhibitors in Hemophilia A.

Replacement therapy with coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) represents the current clinical treatment for patients affected by hemophilia A (HA). This treatment while effective is, however, hampered by the formation of antibodies which inhibit the activity of infused FVIII in up to 30% of treated patients. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) protocols, which envisage frequent infusions of high doses of FVIII to confront this side effect, dramatically increase the already high costs associated to a patient's therapy and are not always effective in all treated patients. Therefore, there are clear unmet needs that must be addressed in order to improve the outcome of these treatments for HA patients. Taking advantage of preclinical mouse models of hemophilia, several strategies have been proposed in recent years to prevent inhibitor formation and eradicate the pre-existing immunity to FVIII inhibitor positive patients. Herein, we will review some of the most promising strategies developed to avoid and eradicate inhibitors, including the use of immunomodulatory drugs or molecules, oral or transplacental delivery as well as cell and gene therapy approaches. The goal is to improve and potentiate the current ITI protocols and eventually make them obsolete.

Bispecific Antibodies for Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases: Clinical Progress to Date.

In autoimmune diseases, a highly complex network comprising diverse cytokines and their receptors on immune cells drives the inflammatory response. A number of therapeutic antibodies targeting these disease-related molecules have been approved for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs), with binding specificity for two different target molecules, have recently been developed for a range of autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and psoriasis, and tested in clinical trials. This review briefly describes the three main categories of bsAb structures developed for autoimmune diseases, including immunoglobulin G (IgG)-like, natural IgG, and tandem antibody fragment formats. The bsAbs developed and evaluated to date mainly target the depletion of T or B cells, the inhibition of T cell differentiation or activation, or the neutralization of proinflammatory cytokines. The clinical evaluation of bsAbs in autoimmune diseases is ongoing, with both successes (phase II trials of obexelimab in systemic lupus erythematosus) and failures (phase II trials of lutikizumab in osteoarthritis and romilkimab in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis), and this review aims to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date summary of the clinical progress of bsAbs in this therapeutic area. Although many challenges remain, bsAbs offer new therapeutic options in the future direction of autoimmune disease treatments.

Bispecific antibodies: a mechanistic review of the pipeline.

The term bispecific antibody (bsAb) is used to describe a large family of molecules designed to recognize two different epitopes or antigens. BsAbs come in many formats, ranging from relatively small proteins, merely consisting of two linked antigen-binding fragments, to large immunoglobulin G (IgG)-like molecules with additional domains attached. An attractive bsAb feature is their potential for novel functionalities - that is, activities that do not exist in mixtures of the parental or reference antibodies. In these so-called obligate bsAbs, the physical linkage of the two binding specificities creates a dependency that can be temporal, with binding events occurring sequentially, or spatial, with binding events occurring simultaneously, such as in linking an effector to a target cell. To date, more than 20 different commercialized technology platforms are available for bsAb creation and development, 2 bsAbs are marketed and over 85 are in clinical development. Here, we review the current bsAb landscape from a mechanistic perspective, including a comprehensive overview of the pipeline.

[Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking factor VIII: a novel alternative therapy for hemophilia A with inhibitors].

Regular prophylaxis using factor (F) VIII products to prevent bleeding in patients with hemophilia A (PWHAs) results in markedly suppressed onset of arthropathy and greatly contributes to improved quality of life. However, some issues remain with the use of clotting factor replacement therapy. The need for multiple intravenous infusions is associated with substantial mental and physical burden, and the inhibitor development results in difficulty of hemostatic management. To overcome these unmet needs, a recombinant humanized anti-FIXa/FX bispecific antibody mimicking FVIIIa function (emicizumab) was created. In phase 1/2 clinical studies, Japanese patients with PWHAs were treated with once-weekly subcutaneous administration of emicizumab. The annual bleeding rates were markedly reduced, irrespective of inhibitor use. A phase 3 global study for PWHA with inhibitor demonstrated a statistically significant efficacy, whereas thrombotic microangiopathy and thromboembolism were reported in 5 patients treated with emicizumab concomitantly with multiple infusions of activated prothrombin complex concentrates. In Japan, emicizumab (HEMLIBRA®) was approved for treatment of PWHAs with inhibitor on March 2018. In conclusion, emicizumab has promising features. Its subcutaneous bioavailability and long half-life (T1/2; approximately 30 days) enable effective bleeding prophylactic treatment at inhibitor status. Additional studies are warranted to establish clinical data on its safety and to define suitable assays for hemostatic monitoring.

Emicizumab for hemophilia A without inhibitors.

Introduction: Hemophilia A (HA) is an inherited bleeding disorder that, if not properly treated, is associated with debilitating joint damage due to recurrent hemarthroses as well as life-threatening bleeds including intracranial hemorrhage. For decades, the only method to prevent bleeding events was to infuse factor (F) VIII concentrates intravenously two to three times weekly. Although successful in reducing bleeding frequency, preventing a high proportion of joint disease, and extending life expectancy, standard continuous prophylaxis with FVIII is burdensome and insufficiently effective at preventing long-term joint dysfunction in some patients. In October 2018, the Federal Drug Administration approved a novel agent, emicizumab-kxwh, for the treatment of patients with HA without inhibitors. Areas covered: In this article, the preclinical and clinical development of emicizumab-kxwh will be reviewed. Data from licensure phase 3 clinical trials will be reviewed in detail discussing issues of both safety and efficacy. Expert opinion: As emicizumab-kxwh leads the way of a shift in treatment paradigm for patients with HA without inhibitors, a number of questions remain, including the impact of emicizumab-kxwh on joint and bone health, inhibitor development, and thrombotic risk. Ultimately, time and clinical investigation will be able to elucidate the influence of emicizumab-kxwh in these areas.

Development of Bispecific Antibody Derivatives for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Development of antibody-based immunotherapeutics has progressed from direct tumor-targeting, with antibodies such as rituximab, to blocking of immune checkpoints to reactivate antitumor immunity. In addition, bispecific antibodies/antibody fragments are also of great interest in cancer therapy, as these constructs have the ability to redirect immune effector cells to cancer targets and, thereby, enhance therapeutic efficacy. A number of bispecific antibody formats have been reported, with the first FDA-approved bispecific antibody being blinatumomab, a so-called bispecific T cell engager (BiTE), which redirects and potently activates T cell immune responses. Recently, we described an additional novel bispecific antibody derivative, termed RTX-CD47, which was designed to inhibit the innate immune checkpoint CD47-SIRPα only on -positive cancer cells. RTX-CD47 contains two antibody fragments in tandem and has monovalent binding specificity for CD47 and . Only upon dual binding to and CD47 RTX-CD47 blocks CD47 "Don't eat me" signaling. Here, we provide a detailed protocol for the construction and functional evaluation of such a bispecific antibody derivative.

A bispecific antibody strategy to target multiple type 2 cytokines in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease in which innate and adaptive immune cells act together to cause eosinophilic inflammation, goblet cell metaplasia (GCM), and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR). In clinical trials using biologicals against IL-4 receptor (IL-4R) α or IL-5, only a subset of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma responded favorably, suggesting that distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms are at play in subgroups of patients called endotypes. However, the effect of multiple cytokine blockade using bispecific antibodies has not been tested. OBJECTIVE: We sought to target simultaneously the IL-4, IL-13, and IL-5 signaling pathways with a novel IL-4Rα/IL-5-bispecific antibody in a murine house dust mite (HDM) model of asthma. METHODS: Two mAbs neutralizing IL-4Rα and IL-5 were generated by using a llama-based antibody platform. Their heavy and light chains were then cotransfected in mammalian cells, resulting in a heterogeneous antibody mixture from which the bispecific antibody was isolated by using a dual anti-idiotypic purification process. C57BL/6J mice were finally sensitized and challenged to HDM extracts and treated during challenge with the antibodies. RESULTS: We successfully generated and characterized the monospecific and bispecific antibodies targeting IL-4Rα and IL-5. The monospecific antibodies could suppress eosinophilia, IgE synthesis, or both, whereas only the IL-4Rα/IL-5-bispecific antibody and the combination of monospecific antibodies additionally inhibited GCM and BHR. CONCLUSION: Type 2 cytokines act synergistically to cause GCM and BHR in HDM-exposed mice. These preclinical results show the feasibility of generating bispecific antibodies that target multiple cytokine signaling pathways as superior inhibitors of asthma features, including the difficult-to-treat GCM.

The current status of immunotherapy in peritoneal carcinomatosis.

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a cancer disease with an urgent need for effective treatment. Conventional chemotherapy failed to show acceptable results. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic chemoperfusion (HIPEC) are only beneficial in few patients with resectable peritoneal metastasis. Immunotherapy could be attractive against PC, as all requirements for immunotherapy are available in the peritoneal cavity. AREAS COVERED: This review analyzes the present literature for immunotherapy of PC. Advances from immune stimulators, radionucleotide-conjugated- and bispecific antibodies to future developments like adoptive engineered T-cells with chimeric receptors are discussed. The clinical development of catumaxomab, which was the first intraperitoneal immunotherapy to be approved for clinical treatment, is discussed. The requirements for future developments are illustrated. Expert commentary: Immunotherapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis is manageable, showing striking cancer cell killing. Improved profiles of adverse events by therapy-induced cytokine release, enhanced specific killing and optimal treatment schedules within multimodal treatment will be key factors.

Alternative therapies for the management of inhibitors.

The development of inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) remains a major treatment complication encountered in the treatment of haemophilia. Not all patients with even the same severity and genotype develop inhibitors suggesting an underlying mechanism of tolerance against FVIII- or FIX-related immunity. One mechanism may be central tolerance observed in patients in whom the FVIII mutation enables some production of the protein. The other is a peripheral tolerance mechanism which may be evident in patients with null mutation. Recently, recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII, Obixur, OBI-1, BAX801) has been developed for the haemostatic treatment of both congenital haemophilia with inhibitor (CHAWI) and acquired haemophilia A (AHA). In 28 subjects with AHA with life-/limb-threatening bleeding, rpFVIII reduced or stopped bleeding in all patients within 24 h. The cross-reactivity of anti-human FVIII antibodies to rpFVIII remains around 30-50%. Recently, new therapeutics based on the quite novel concepts have been developed and clinical studies are ongoing. These are humanized asymmetric antibody mimicking FVIIIa function by maintaining a suitable interaction between FIXa and FX (Emicizumab, ACE910), and small interfering RNAs (siRNA, ALN-AT3) suppress liver production of AT through post-transcriptional gene silencing and a humanized anti-TFPI monoclonal antibody (Concizumab). Their main advantages are longer half-life, subcutaneous applicability and efficacy irrespective of the presence of inhibitors which will make it easier to initiate more effective treatment especially early childhood.

A bispecific antibody mimicking factor VIII in hemophilia A therapy.

Serious issues in current hemostatic treatment of hemophilia A are the requirement for frequent intravenous administrations of factor (F) VIII, FVIII inhibitor development, and hemostatic treatment for patients with this inhibitor. For the purpose of overcoming these challenges, the FVIIIa-substituting bispecific antibody against FIXa/FX (ACE910, INN emicizumab) was produced. Emicizumab demonstrated marked hemostatic effects on both ongoing and spontaneous joint bleeding in the acquired hemophilia A primate model. The clinical phase 1 study designed to assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of emicizumab has been initiated. Severe emicizumab-related adverse events were minimal. The t1/2 was approximately 30 days, and bleeding events were significantly decreased by weekly subcutaneous administration in severe hemophilia A patients, independently of the presence of the inhibitor. Currently, the phase 1/2 extension study is ongoing. We anticipate that emicizumab will show the benefits of prophylactic efficacy with subcutaneous administration at a much lower frequency.

Blinatumomab: a CD19/CD3 bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) with unique anti-tumor efficacy.

Blinatumomab is a member of a novel class of T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies, so-called Bispecific T cell Engager (BiTEs). It is directed against the B cell differentiation antigen CD19 and intended for treatment of B cell malignancies. In clinical phase I/II trials, blinatumomab showed remarkable single-agent activity in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma and R/R B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-precursor ALL). Cytokine release syndrome and neurological side effects were dose-limiting. Adverse effects were well manageable and transient in nature. Based on results of an international phase II trial, blinatumomab received FDA approval for the treatment of R/R B-precursor ALL in December 2014. Ongoing and future trials will contribute to further optimization of blinatumomab-based T cell therapy and have to show that integration of blinatumomab in current and innovative treatment protocols improves overall survival and quality of life of patients with B cell malignancies.